ElectriCISO uses authoritative regulatory content plus your assessments, evidence, policies, risks, and findings to draft, explain, summarize, and guide work in context. The goal is faster progress with traceable answers, not generic chatbot output.
Ten distinct AI capabilities woven into every module — each purpose-calibrated for compliance accuracy, not general conversation. Grounded in authoritative regulatory data and your organization’s actual posture.
7 dedicated framework assistants, each grounded in its regulatory corpus plus your organization’s data. Ask in plain English, get answers with clickable citations back to the actual rule text.
Search by meaning across risks, meetings, policies, findings, and evidence. Ask questions in natural language, get relevant results regardless of wording.
Transform requirements into structured, professional security policies with framework-aligned titles, outlines, and section-by-section drafting.
AI identifies duplicate risks via semantic matching before they pollute your register. Three-signal detection — vector similarity, trigram title matching, keyword overlap — with confidence ratings (High/Medium/Low) for every flag.
A multi-signal algorithm scores every incoming threat for relevance and severity. Raw CVE bulletins and breach notifications are transformed into structured executive briefings with action steps and ready-to-import risk entries.
A professional interviewer that explains the requirement, asks one question at a time, adapts based on your answers, and drafts a formal compliance response from your specific inputs — not generic boilerplate.
Real-time Perplexity Sonar search runs during active investigations, pulling current threat actor techniques, patch details, and CVE context directly into the incident chat — without leaving the platform.
AI-generated formal assessment responses incorporating your answers, org context, gap analysis, and evidence suggestions.
Browser-based speech-to-text for all compliance chat interfaces. Speak your assessment answers naturally — no audio is ever sent to the server. Org-level toggle for privacy compliance.
CrossWalker evaluates overlap across 42 directed framework pairs using curated source material and human-review gates. The point is traceable reuse with provenance, not speculative mapping or blind automation.
Every AI answer travels through a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline that simultaneously queries authoritative regulatory text and your organization’s own data — then merges, ranks, and cites the sources before a single word is generated.
Multi-pattern prompt injection detection. Hostile patterns replaced with [REDACTED], creating an audit trail.
Convert the user's question into a high-dimensional vector using a commercial embedding model.
Simultaneously query org-scoped chunks (your data) and global knowledge chunks (framework text) using pgvector cosine distance.
Pull recent findings, control status summaries, risk register items, and task data via direct SQL for precision.
Results ranked by similarity score, filtered by context constraints (control ID, assessment scope, meeting focus).
System instructions + context sections + conversation history assembled into a grounded prompt. Response returned with clickable citation objects.
Press Ctrl+K from any page. Ask questions in natural language. The AI Copilot searches across risks, meetings, policies, tasks, compliance findings, and evidence in a unified vector space.
Focus results on specific domains: Risk Register, Tasks, Meetings, Policies, or individual compliance frameworks.
Every response shows numbered source documents with similarity scores, so you can verify exactly what the AI used.
Queries about risk registers route to structured SQL for accuracy. Everything else goes through vector similarity for semantic precision.
7 compliance modules, 7 specialized chat assistants. Each grounded in its own regulatory corpus, your assessment data, and your organization’s specific context — so the answer to “What does GLBA require here?” is always grounded in 16 CFR 314, not a generic summary.
RAG chat, control-specific Q&A, explain & breakdown modes, AI interview, draft generation with maturity scoring.
Dual-tier RAG with global corpus and org-specific data. Inline card enrichment, control and clause knowledge modals.
Review session chat, control-scoped Q&A with narrative + action items, AI-drafted stakeholder communications.
Versioned knowledge sources with active source management. RAG chat grounded in Safeguards Rule guidance.
Review session chat with PCI-specific system prompts and control context for payment card compliance reviews.
AI assistant grounded in the full NIST CSF 2.0 knowledge corpus. Four prompt types: implementation guidance, gap analysis, evidence recommendations, and tier-to-tier remediation planning.
Safeguard-specific AI guidance grounded in the CIS Controls v8 knowledge corpus. IG-appropriate implementation steps, evidence recommendations, and common failure modes per control.
Provide a summary statement, applicable scope, and core requirement. The AI generates a framework-aligned title, structured outline, and polished section-by-section draft — calibrated to your organization’s context and the applicable frameworks. Your team reviews and publishes.
AI refines your summary into a professional title and description aligned with compliance naming conventions.
Sections with summary bullets and required data points. Full guidance before a word of the policy is drafted.
Each section is drafted with numbered subsections, calibrated to your org's context and applicable frameworks.
Framework tags (HIPAA, GLBA, ISO 27001, NIST, PCI-DSS) and topic tags auto-suggested with reasoning.
Authoritative regulatory content flows from curated corpus files through specialized ingestion scripts into PostgreSQL knowledge tables, then into vector storage for real-time retrieval.
Markdown & JSON regulatory source material
Structured sections with 7-type taxonomy
pgvector embeddings for semantic search
| Section Type | Storage | Description |
|---|---|---|
| plain_explanation | Prose | Human-readable explanation in clear language |
| evidence | JSON Array | Evidence items auditors expect to see |
| audit_questions | JSON Array | Questions an auditor would ask |
| technical | Prose | Technical implementation guidance |
| key_points | JSON Array | Critical implementation points |
| common_failures | JSON Array | Frequently observed compliance failures |
| scoring | Prose | Maturity scoring and rating guidance |
Five distinct prompt engineering patterns calibrated for compliance accuracy, not generic conversation.
Policy generation, risk intake, and threat summarization use OpenAI's JSON mode with exact schema definitions. Multi-stage fallback parser handles markdown-wrapped responses.
Interview mode uses custom delimiter-based protocol: narrative response + machine-readable metadata (readyToDraft, questionsRemaining, evidenceNeeded) in a single completion.
Incident responder separates conversational analysis from actionable task lists using delimiter markers, enabling structured task extraction.
Every chat endpoint injects org name, institution type, current control status, and recent findings into system messages for grounded responses.
Calibrated low-temperature settings for consistency. Each task category — policy generation, risk intake, compliance chat — is individually tuned for accuracy. Every endpoint optimized for its purpose.
When image evidence is attached to incidents, the system automatically switches to GPT-4o's vision model for screenshot and document analysis.
Every sync cycle re-embeds all 500 records. Wasted API credits, increased latency, unnecessary database churn.
SHA-256 digest of embeddable text. If hash matches, skip entirely. Only 50 changed records embedded — 10x cost reduction.
When external sources like ConnectSecure sync periodically, a naive approach re-embeds every record on every cycle. Differential indexing uses SHA-256 content hashes to skip unchanged records, cutting API costs by 80-90%.
Every AI interaction is protected by layered security: prompt injection detection, input sanitization, output validation, rate limiting, and encrypted key management.
A dedicated input sanitization pipeline detects and neutralizes multiple categories of prompt injection patterns. Detected patterns are replaced with [REDACTED] to create an audit trail.
Every AI endpoint validates inputs with structured validators. Messages and conversation length are capped to prevent abuse. No system role injection possible.
AI responses are parsed through multi-stage validators. Risk update changes pass through field-level sanitization with allowed value enforcement. Malformed JSON triggers errors, not pass-through.
Per-organization rate limiting on all AI endpoints. Per-org encrypted API keys (AES-256-GCM). Keys never returned in API responses or logged. Per-org cost attribution.
The right model for every task. Cost-optimized routing ensures you never pay more than necessary while maintaining quality where it matters.
PRIMARY MODEL
All compliance chats, policy generation, risk intake, assessment drafts, and meeting analysis. Fast, accurate, cost-effective.
EMBEDDING MODEL
All vector embeddings: risks, meetings, knowledge, findings, evidence, assessments, tasks, and integration data.
VISION MODEL
Activated only when image evidence is attached to incident response chats. Multimodal analysis of screenshots and documents.
Real-time web-grounded threat intelligence using search-augmented AI models. Automated and manual research tiers with citation passthrough.
Every KPI, every chart, every alert on the dashboard is fed by the same intelligence layer. Real-time exploitation alerts, risk distribution, task status, and threat watch — all in one view.
Not generic internet knowledge. Answers sourced from 34 CFR, 16 CFR 314, ISO 27001 Annex A, HIPAA Security Rule, and PCI-DSS v4.0.
Every response incorporates your assessment status, risk register, meeting notes, policy library, and actual compliance posture.
Every AI response includes numbered source documents with relevance scores. Verify exactly what the AI used to form its answer.
Per-org rate limits, encrypted BYOK API keys, RLS-scoped vector storage. Your data never mingles with another organization's.
Generic AI gives you generic answers. ElectriCISO gives you answers grounded in your regulatory requirements, your current assessment status, and your organization’s actual posture — with citations you can click.